← All skills

Layer 3 · Problem space

User needs

/layers-user-needs

Elicit and prioritise user needs, pains, and desires — the opportunities that feed product strategy.

Example prompts

Drop one of these into your AI tool. The skill takes it from there.

  • Turn these interview notes into prioritised job stories with /layers-user-needs.
  • Help me /layers-user-needs for this onboarding flow — I have research, I need direction.
  • I have a feature list pretending to be a roadmap. Run /layers-user-needs and rebuild it around opportunities.

The skill itself

What /layers-user-needs tells the AI to do

Below is the actual skill — the instructions your AI tool follows when you run it. Reading it is optional; the skill loads itself.

/layers-user-needs

Assumes /layers-intro has been loaded. This skill is a library of techniques, not a script — see “How to use these skills” there.

User needs are what we think users are trying to achieve, and why — an interpretation built on observed behaviour and domain knowledge, not a direct capture of reality. This layer sits between the messy raw material of observation and the deliberate decisions of the solution space.

The outputs here are opportunities: needs (what users want to achieve), pains (what causes friction), and desires (improvements they’d value). All three are valid — elicit all three.


The decisions this layer makes

  • Who exactly the users are whose needs we’re defining — and in what situation
  • What jobs they’re trying to do: functional, emotional, and social
  • Which needs are grounded in evidence, and which are assumptions
  • Which needs matter most, and why

If the needs are already clear and grounded, don’t re-elicit them for the sake of it — take them to /layers-product-strategy.


Disciplines — what keeps needs honest

  • Need, not solution. “When I need a report, I want to export to CSV” is a solution. Push to the underlying need.
  • Strip the mechanism. If the “When” clause references your specific solution (your dashboard, your CSM, your weekly email), you’re describing the current system, not the need. Re-state it independent of who or what serves it: what’s true about the user at the moment they need this? The need follows from the state, not the mechanism.
  • The “When” must be picturable. Specific enough to see the moment it happens — triggered by an event, a feeling, a rhythm, or a threshold crossed. Push until it is.
  • Elicit emotional and social jobs, not just functional. They’re chronically under-articulated even when they’re shaping behaviour. Asking explicitly is usually what surfaces them. (Functional → interaction & model; emotional → surface tone/feedback; social → surface, sometimes strategy.)
  • Mark confidence: observed / inferred / assumed.
  • Workarounds are signal. A need real enough to motivate a spreadsheet or a workaround email is a strong one.

Techniques

Job stories are the default; the rest suit particular situations.

TechniqueUse it when
Job stories (JTBD)Default. When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]. Keeps solutions out; the “When” clause forces specificity.
User storiesThe team prefers role-based framing or an existing Agile workflow.
Top tasks analysis (Gerry McGovern)Large existing user base — identify which tasks matter most by frequency. Statistical, survey-based.
Persona + scenarioCommunicating to stakeholders who think in archetypes. Good for alignment; less precise for design.
ODI desired outcomes (Ulwick)Precise, measurable statements — “Minimize [metric] when [context].” Maps directly to opportunity scoring.
Surface hidden needsPrompts to find what’s ignored: what users do before/after the moment you focus on; what they wish they didn’t have to do; what a workaround currently serves.
Rough prioritisationOrder by importance × how poorly currently served. A need that matters and is badly served is a high-value opportunity. Keep it rough — precise scoring is strategy work.

Working with the designer

First settle who the users are and in what situation — not “users” but which type, when. If there’s more than one distinct type with different needs, work them separately. Note the source (research, domain knowledge, or assumption); if it’s assumption, mark it and plan to validate.

Then work the needs the designer raises through the disciplines above, and probe for hidden ones. Offer the technique that fits — job stories by default, ODI when measurability matters, top tasks when there’s a large user base. Don’t run a fixed sequence.

Capture only the residue: the prioritised needs with confidence ratings, the unprioritised-but-surfaced ones (so they aren’t lost), gaps (probably-real needs not yet grounded), and any contradictions between user types. Keep it to what carries a decision.

These needs are the opportunities for /layers-product-strategy. If they’re mostly assumed, consider /layers-observed-behaviour to gather evidence before building strategy on them.

Example output

An example of what /layers-user-needs captures

From a customer referral programme.

Job stories

1. Personal referral inferred

When I'm in a conversation with a peer who needs a better tool like this, I want to pass on a concrete recommendation that includes something useful for them, so I can be genuinely helpful without it feeling like I have a personal stake in it.

2. Status and reward transparency inferred

When time has passed since I referred someone, I want to know whether they signed up, whether I've earned my reward, and what its current status is, so I don't feel like I was promised something that disappeared without explanation.

3. Public referral observed

When I'm in a public context where recommending tools is natural, I want to share the product in a way that reads as a genuine endorsement from a credible practitioner — not as someone promoting for a bonus.

Strategic flags

  • Altruism evidence is stronger than assumed. Observed public referrals happened without any mechanism or incentive. A voucher may activate referrers who need a nudge — but if it becomes the dominant framing, it can undermine motivation for people already acting from goodwill.
  • Gift framing is in the design but needs to be surfaced. The referee discount exists. The referrer needs to know about it — and it should be presented as what they're giving, not only what they're getting.

Install

Install the skills

Install in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex & more

npx skills add jamiemill/layers-skills

Install once with the skills package, then run any /layers-* skill in your AI tool.